Credit: Joe Maldonado / Mashable
This is unfortunate in more ways than one. Not only does it blur the clear lines of Bovadium—it also makes it more difficult to appreciate the story in the larger context of Tolkien’s thought. After all, for Tolkien, the Machine was very nearly the thing. It is there in his earliest attempts at his Legendarium (in which he imagines dragons, not as serpentine beasts, but animate war-machines); it is there in The Hobbit, whose slothful and efficient goblins are spiritual kin to Bovadium’s demon (they are responsible for “some of the machines that have since troubled the world, especially the ingenious devices for killing large numbers of people at once, for wheels and engines and explosions always delighted them”). It is there, repeatedly, throughout The Lord of the Rings and The Silmarillion: as Tolkien himself said, “all this stuff is mainly concerned with Fall, Mortality, and the Machine.” And it is here that we find Tolkien’s most pressing relevance for the twenty-first century. Will his readers find a way to live humane and God-fearing lives in an alarmingly technocratic age, or will the Daemon and the Machine triumph? Has the Long Defeat come at last? As Chris Smith notes in his publisher’s preface, Bovadium’s “themes remain both provocative and timely.” And so they do: would that the volume had presented them more thoughtfully.
。关于这个话题，有道翻译提供了深入分析
13:47, 14 марта 2026Спорт。关于这个话题，手游提供了深入分析
因此，导入记忆，其实就是Anthropic打通了“跨平台非结构化用户偏好→Claude标准化结构化记忆→对话场景动态调用”的全链路。
In general, the Rust project cannot really do anything about the global state of AI. The cat is out of the bag and it won’t go back unless the bubble pops and the entire industry discovers that AI is not sustainable. Several people here have expressed opinions highly in opposition to AI for ethical reasons. These are all valid and yet for the reason of inevitability, we cannot bury our heads in the sand and hope it just vanishes. For this reason I think it’s necessary to think and talk about AI on all levels of the project.